Explain how Nagel’s essay highlights the irresolvable dilemma between a utilitarian approach to War and the absolutist approach.
Walzer examines excuses for terrorism while granting that terrorism cannot be morally justified. What is the distinction between a justification and an excuse?
According to Valls, what are the two difficulties that arise when one is trying to define “terrorism”? What final definition of the term does Valls stipulate that he will use in his arguments?