To avoid a biased interpretation of data, I would preferably use an artifact to provoke a viewer to analyze data from an individual perspective. If viewers are exposed to the real thing, they can independently crackdown the puzzle and interpret information in their way. Therefore, in my research project, I might use video recording as my original artifact. I would capture relevant happenings, expressions, and conversations that can satisfy research questions. I could also make efforts to get access to social media groups my participants engage in, such as Facebook or Twitter. In social media groups platforms, the participants are likely to freely express and share their ideas without fear of surveillance or other parties’ punishment.
In my research project, I could critically study the culture of the participants’ school and behavior patterns. Also, I would examine students’ norms at home and their parents’ interactions regarding school activities. However, during the study of participants at their homes, I would be careful not to overstep and interfere with their privacy. After that, I will film the participants in their routine in school such that viewers can make their conclusions. In the school’s social groups, I could ask what propels the participants to perform or fail in school.
The video technique has the advantage of capturing events as they happen without misinterpretation. The video method provides reliable information that can answer research questions in a school setup. Students’ attitudes, morale, determination, and challenges they experience in school can be revealed in video analysis. To enhance the validity of the interpretation of data collected, responses from the social groups of the participants can provide more informed data that is bias-free.
I am in total agreement with the approach of artifacts used by my classmates. The reason is that they avoid a biased interpretation that a researcher may make. A more in-depth analysis of information can be achieved by asking the participants permission to collect data from them. The approach used by the students involves the group under study, deductions made, therefore, are likely to be valid and reliable. They have also used visualized sources of artifacts; these bear a higher convincing power to viewers of the data collected. The participants’ privacy is also observed; this is worth appreciating since if artifacts are not used correctly, they can interfere with human rights.